Exclusive: Home Office researchers accused of challenging intimate sexual items and halting genuine weddings
Genuine duos are being prevented from getting married and are vulnerable to ” disparage” and “gruelling” checks as part of a government crackdown on sham unions, a Guardian investigation has found.
Couples and solicitors described marriage ceremonies being interrupted so that the Home office could question parties about their sexuality lives, an official finding a nude slide on a person’s phone and showing it to others in the room, and dawning attacks carried out to check if duos were sharing a bed.
In one case, a couple were told their relationship is not able to be sincere because they were wearing pyjamas in bunked. In others, parties have been detained for months after being incorrectly accused of entering into a imitation marriage.
In recent years the government has stimulated it more difficult for migrants to united in the UK, in an effort to stop people using marriage to UK or EU citizens as a means to remain in the country.
Since changes to the law in 2015, registrars requires them to report to the Home Office whenever most categories of migrants give notice of marriage. The Home office was given dominances to delay nuptials for up to 70 days to allow for investigations.
Information obtained by the Guardian through a freedom of information request indicates registrars mailed 2,868 slouse 24 reports- which notify the authorities to a potential sham matrimony- in 2018, a 40% rise from 2,038 in 2014. Advocates said registrars has now become” infected with different cultures of the unfriendly surrounding “.
Of those reports last year, 1,618( 56%) were seen worthy of investigation, compared with 1,439( 58%) in 2015. The Home office rejecting to share data on the number of members of weddings determined to be shams.
Nath Gbikpi, of Wesley Gryk Solicitors, said the government’s approach to migrant unions needed to be seen as part of its unfriendly situation plan.” The Home Office has put itself in a position where it can prevent a genuine couple, whom they agree to be in a genuine relation, to get married ,” she said.
One couple, Qasim, 29, from Pakistan, and Debora, 33, from Portugal, were asleep at home when they were raided by four officials in January 2016.” We were questioned separately about our relationship and then Qasim was arrested, taken away and locked up in detention for four months before the Main office finally accepted that our relationship was genuine ,” Debora said.
” I was in a state of offend and trauma all the time I was in detention ,” said Qasim.” It was very reviling that the Main office came inside our residence to check that everything was connected .”
Another couple who sought permission to marry were told their relationship would not be investigated, only to have their wedding ceremony ended by officials, according to a statement submitted to their advocates and provided to the Guardian.
The statement said the couple were taken into separate areas and asked about their fornication lives, including detailed information about sexual positions and contraception. The girl was so distressed that partway through the interrogation she refused to answer any more questions. The Home Office officials then halted the opening ceremony and proclaimed the wedding to be sham.
The couple, who are still together, is very much humbled that they did not tell their reception guests that the wedlock had not been permitted to go ahead, instead continuing with the episode and pretending to celebrate.
In another case, a lesbian couple were invited to a Home office reporting centre for an interview after they requested permission to enter into a civil partnership. The couple were questioned separately, the British human for 90 times and his Thai partner for five hours.
The Main office urges the government to inspect the couple’s phones and seen an email sent by the Thai man many years before to a former collaborator, which included a naked photo of himself. This photo was shown to everyone in the interview room, leaving the man feeling humbled, the couple said.
” He described the whole experience as disgusting ,” the British serviceman said.” They grilled him in a exceedingly aggressive channel that he found exceedingly scandalizing .” The in-migration lawsuit was eventually agreed a few months ago in the couple’s favour.
The Main office declined to comment on individual cases.
Poppy Firmin, a caseworker at Duncan Lewis Solicitors, said:” Numerous parties go through the asylum process unrepresented. In the meantime you can’t work, you often can’t investigate, and then you may or may not be permitted to marry. Or you may be detained after your marriage ceremony is gatecrashed by Main office officials. It’s very degrade .”
Elizabeth Ruddick, of Wilsons Attorney, said:” Home office officials may come to your dwelling early in the morning and check up on the number of toothbrushes … The Main office has every right to to interfere each step of the style, and some registrars have become infected with the culture of the unfriendly medium .”
A Main office spokesman said the government was focused on ensuring that clas movement was based on a sincere rapport.” Registrars are given thorough evidence-based guidance on circumstances that may promote feelings about a wedlock, such as particular practices and the level of information one party known about another ,” the spokesperson said.” It would then be for Home Office immigration officials to decide whether or not to investigate further .”