Natural Cycles was applauded as a stress-free, hormone-free contraceptive. Then ladies began reporting unwanted pregnancies

Last summer I had an abortion. Statistically unremarkable, yes, but quarry wasn’t because of a divide condom or a missed pill. I was 4 months into a tense rapport with a much-hyped Swedish” digital contraceptive “~ ATAGEND, a smartphone app announced Natural Cycles. I had spent my 20 s on the pill, but detested not knowing whether my emotional state was down to artificial hormones or not. My boyfriend and I had been together for eight months, and I was urgently searching something better, something that wouldn’t acquire me feel so anxious.

That’s when the adverts started following me around on social media: brightening ladies reclining in Scandi bedrooms, all pale grey expanses and dappled light-headed, brandishing basal thermometers and telling me how great it believe there” get to know yourself better “. Natural Cycles’ ads predicted the” world’s firstly contraceptive app “, something” natural, hormone free& non-invasive “. I could start using it without a two-week wait for a doctor’s appointment and so, in a fug of hormones and frustration, I bought a subscription. I was sold on glossy promises, a sleek user interface and the facts of the case that a former Cern physicist, Elina Berglund, was at the company’s helm. But four months in, it neglected. Berglund helped detect the Higgs boson; but it is about to change her algorithm couldn’t delineate my menstrual cycle.

Femtech, or female health technology, is going through a boom period, with an estimated $ 1bn of such investments raised worldwide in the last three years. Apps such as Clue, Dot, Glow and Spot On are all popular age trackers, but Natural Cycles is the only one certified as contraception. In 2017, it was approved for help across the EU, get the green light from the German inspection and certification organisation, Tuv Sud.

How does it wield? It comprises an app, an annual subscription of about PS60, and a thermometer accurate to two decimal points( free in the berth ). You input your temperature immediately following you wake up, and the app constitutes predictions about your fertility each day: park for” travel have unprotected sexuality”, red for” not unless you require a baby”( you can also use the app to plan teenage pregnancies ). No hormones , no embed and, supposedly , no stress. It has its own speech: customers are known as “Cyclers”, and useful information is available via a “Cyclerpedia”. It seems as simple as ordering a takeaway or a taxi from your telephone; of course there’s an app for fertility, too.

Natural Cycles had already been registered more than 700,000 users from more than 200 countries, 125,000 of them in the UK. But its certification as contraception is under review in Sweden, where the company and its married co-founders are based. In January, a major Swedish infirmary reported that 37 of the 668 women who had sought an abortion there between September and December 2017 were use Natural Cycles as their sole family planning, and the Medical Products Agency of Sweden began to investigate. Natural Cycles has responded that the number of maternities is proportional to the registered number of Swedish users and” in line with our expectancies “; but as someone who didn’t report my own maternity last year, continuing it secret even from my parents, I wonder how many more “theres been”.

It wasn’t the stigma that kept me quiet, or the sadness, though that trailed me all summertime like the malevolent tune of an ice-cream van. It wasn’t the fact that being 28, in a stable-seeming relation and game for motherhood in a couple of years, I absence explanations of vote other than precarious investments and a relationship only shy of its first anniversary( those are excellent concludes ). No, my stillnes was because I felt colossally naive. I’d exploited the app in accordance with the rules I do most of the technology in “peoples lives”: not quite knowing how it operates, but taking for granted that it does. Speaking to others who bought the app as contraception( about 75% of Natural Cycles’ total user basi, according to its CEO ), it seems that many feel the same.

I spoke to Amy, 29, who was fed up with hormones when she started using the app as her sole family planning. Three months later, she was pregnant, a” massive stun “. Though she declares she may have made a mistake, she can’t pinpoint the mistakes.” You’re told all you need to know is yourself. I believed in it the same road I did the pill and repute I did everything right .” Having already booked her wed, “shes gone” onward with the pregnancy, giving birth weeks before she trod down the aisle.” It’s supposed to clear you feel like you have more dominate, but in fact it did the opposite: when I fell pregnant it felt like a decision was taken out of our hands. It wasn’t how we’d have planned it, and I don’t recommend weddings 2 weeks postpartum, but I’m lucky it was something we wanted in the long run .”

Marie, 30, firstly heard about the app when she saw an Instagram post about it( sought for Natural Cycles and you will find the thousands of posts by influencers telling you how it changed their lives ).” I didn’t recognize the hashtag at the very end of the caption which said that it was a sponsored post ,” she says. She had been taking Yasmin, a usually prescribed contraceptive pill, for six years when she made the switching, hoping that the app would be a dependable and easy alternative. A time into such relationships, and eight months into using Natural Cycles, Marie realised she was pregnant. She had an abortion that proved harrowing, make contributions to the breakdown of the relationship and extending her into what she describes as” a pit of hopelessnes “.

She didn’t want to tell anyone about it. She’d had an abortion once before, when a morning-after pill didn’t work, but this time she felt remorseful:” I felt like I’d played alone in the decision to use the app and had been extremely trusting. But I was also angry that I’d been treated like a consumer , not a patient .”

Like Marie, I didn’t go to my GP before I switched to the app, perhaps because I subconsciously knew he’d advise against it. In many roads he knows me better than any algorithm can. He put me on the pill at 18 because I had an irregular cycle. I afterward learned I had polycystic ovary disorder, which I now know makes me a horrendous candidate for Natural Cycles, because my ovulation is unpredictable and erratic.

A year earlier, before I’d heard of the app, I had been to see a gynaecologist to discuss birth control, visualizing I required a non-hormonal curl fitted. It was the first time a medical professional had helped me to truly understand the extent of my options. She depicted me a fixed of arranges and schemed each alternative available( no app got a mention) to show me the advantages and detriments. Discerning v convulsions, hollow v upkeep, long- v short-term.

I’d spoke grisly things about the hormonal vaginal sound- a widely shared section about a young, fit female who died after a blood clot- but concurred, based on what she felt would suit me best, to try it. We chortled at how it’s impossible to experiment any family planning online without encountering repugnance floors. I told myself I would rely a professional and discontinue my Googling as it exclusively induced feeling; but after a few psychotic weeks wearing compressing socks to shun blood clots, I was done.

None of the posts on my social-media feed suggested that being a “Cycler” “wouldve been” such a frustrating, often daunting commitment. One paid-for post I recognized featured a still life of a puppy, a duo of on-trend headphones, a self-help notebook and a thermometer, with a 250 -word caption starting with” 5 things I need in the morning. Nuzzles from Bee[ the dog ], tea, music, positive paraphrases and the first thing I do when I wake up- my Natural Cycles thermometer .” But I found that taking your temperature regularly is not so easy. The number of meters I leapt out of bunk bleary-eyed and needing to urinate, then realised I hadn’t first taken my temperature, intend I started waking up in the middle of the night to pre-emptively urinate, panicked about missing my measuring space in the morning. On the pill, it didn’t matter if I’d simply woken up, was lying down or standing up when I took it. With Natural Cycles, the slightest motion seems to be weigh. It was comedic until it became terrible; I got pregnant when the predictions of fruitful and infertile changed backward and forward in one day, turning from light-green to red, after I had unprotected sex.

I now know that the ideal Cycler is a narrow, rather old-fashioned category of being. She’s in a stable tie-in with a stable lifestyle.( Shift-workers, world-travellers, the sickly, the emphasized, insomniacs and sluts be advised .) She’s about 29, and rarely knowledge deliriums or hangovers. She is savvy about birthrate and committed to the effort required to racetrack hers. I could add that her phone is never lost or terminate and she’s never late to labour. She wakes up at the same experience every day, with a charged phone and a thermometer within reach.

” From the information provided by Natural Cycles, I expected that my body temperature would follow a clear decoration and that I would be able to pinpoint five days in every four-week cycle that I was fertile ,” says Lucy, 32. She swopped from the pill after becoming concerned about an increased risk of breast cancer, after one of her friends was diagnosed.” I did feel like I was getting to understand my form better, but soon realised that I can’t pinpoint when I wake up each day. Some mornings I incite at 5am, roll over and try to sleep for another hour or two, sometimes I toss and turn from 2am to 6am and then was sleeping, and so on .” Her readings were erratic.” I couldn’t see a structure and this undermined my confidence. After using Natural Cycles for three full hertzs, I discovered I was still having eight to 10 ruby-red[ ie maybe fruitful] days per cycle .” After four months, she decided it was no better than expending a calendar and went back on the pill.

No form of contraception is 100% effective; most are assessed according to two metrics: usual use and perfect implement. “Typical” shows a boundary for human error; “perfect” is when it’s used absolutely correctly. With perfect utilization, Natural Cycles tallies as 99% effective, with precisely 1% of the status of women growing pregnant. With regular application, according to clinical studies carried out by the company( self-selecting, rather than randomised see tribulations ), that plunges to 93%. This is often cited by the company as favourable compared with the pill( 91% effective with” regular expend “). But, unlike the pill, you’re not covered for every day of the month. You have to abstain or use other contraception on fertile daylights. And in the first few months, as the app “gets to know you”, these are pretty near continuous.

When I talk to Raoul Scherwitzl, the CEO and co-founder of Natural Cycles, he is charming and sincere and calls at accurately the appointed hour , not a second early or late.” My wife and I represent a usual user-couple ,” he says.” Elina was on hormonal birth control for 10 years and we knew we wanted offsprings, but in a couple of years. We both had PhDs in physics and were working at Cern, dealing with chaotic, fluctuating data, trying to look for the Higgs boson, which is basically looking for a signal amid racket. We started exerting the same statistical methodologies to pinpoint my wife’s ovulation amid her varied temperatures. We read up on the literature and developed an algorithm which our colleagues started utilizing, very. We were extending it on the Cern servers and then utilizing Google spreadsheets. We identified it as an unmet demand. There is the absence of selection and we wanted to innovate in a significant domain .”

Natural Cycles founders Elina Berglund and Raoul Scherwitzl.

I tell Scherwitzl that, though the require is very, after to buy the app, caveat after caveat exposed itself. I didn’t know it would take months to become dependable.” The algorithm is cautious by design ,” he shows.” It renders cherry-red epoches unless it’s sure .” I tell him how I got pregnant, when the predictions changed after I’d had sex. Scherwitzl empathises (” I am sorry to hear that “) but include an indication that as well as “downsides”, there is” a huge upside with all the joyous consumers” and that” the most important thing is to use defence on blood-red dates: it relies on that “.

Has the company adapted its communication strategy to reflect the experience of users who have become pregnant?” At the core, our messaging has always been floored on facts but we do evolve what we say. We used to regime the 93% flesh but without the privilege context, so there were certain expectations on the commodity .” The 93% figure comes from existing customers responding to the company’s calls for participates, study that has been criticised by a reproductive health expert as” inappropriate and misleading”, and more like “marketing research” than a medical study. But Scherwitzl holds the data is robust, and preferable to a medicalised self-control measure.” The committee is pros and cons to that type of study, and in our opinions this manifests the world better .”

What about the targeted publicizing? Isn’t it strange to get social-media influencers( one foremost Swedish blogger is now overseas investors) to promote a medical product? He doesn’t think so.” Social media allows us to control the narrative because there’s lots of misinformation out there , not only with us but with all the types of family planning. We can also target the right age group .”

The investigations conducted by Sweden’s medical watchdog is now six months in, and has started the next phase, re-examine market textile, past clinical studies and fresh user data. Reports of unwanted maternities had not been able to, nonetheless, had any negative effect on the business.

In a 2016 interrogation I care I’d read, Scherwitzl’s wife and business collaborator Elina Berglund described her model consumer as a woman who is planning to have children at some degree, and who would like a end from hormonal contraception before trying. It’s not a good alternative for women who want to solely avoid a pregnancy, she said. But somehow this message has got lost in Natural Cycles’ sell; this is very much not what the word “contraception” means to me.

Indeed, on the section of the Natural Cycles website aimed at medical professionals there is a” decision tree” for physicians considering prescribing the app as family planning. Is the patient over 18? Is she satisfied with her current family planning? If the answers to those questions are yes and no, then the third is: would she be “devastated” to get pregnant within the next year? If the answer is yes, the doctor is told not to prescribe the app. Perhaps those questions should be compulsory when you click through on a Natural Cycle link.

An image from the Natural Cycles Instagram chronicle.

Instead, the app usurps the intimate voice of a trusted physician, mixed with the sort of gamified messaging you find on other apps. You might get an update saying,” Nice swerves! You have a neat and smooth temperature arc with small day-to-day variations. Retain up the good work !” The company’s social media is peppered with hashtags such as #yourcyclematters and #wakeupmeasuregetup. The perkiness is grating- even the thermometer endures the slogan” Good morning !”- and can be pressurising, too. One wife I spoke to who purchased Natural Cycles to continue efforts to hope a pregnancy told the company she wanted to leave after six months, as the daily tracking was very traumatic. She emailed to ask for a breach,” for psychological wellbeing “. A customer service manager responded to say she could cancel, and reactivate when she wanted, but that” I took a quick look at your data, and to its implementation of ovulation everything searches good !”, adding,” You do not need to worry about losing additional data- we never remove anything !” Those ejaculation recognizes don’t making this reassurances any less creepy.

Perhaps this false-hearted sense of friendship is for that reason that i felt more like a betrayal to discovery myself pregnant than if the pill were at fault. After the abortion, the honeymoon reporting period my relationship discontinued abruptly. It felt like we’d begun our romantic hasten with a false-hearted start. I stopped exploiting the thermometer and went back on the pill, but it took me a little while longer to place practices with the app. I deleted it from my phone, exclusively to realise the direct debit was rolling and non-refundable. I have just been cast another PS60 bill, for a contraceptive app I no longer employ, that got me pregnant. But it’s not just the money that bothers me – it’s the remember that I introduced so much better sect in a engineering that in the end relied on something as inaccurate as my mas. What’s the hashtag for that?

* If you would like your statement to be considered for inclusion on Weekend magazine’s notes page in reproduce, please email weekend @theguardian. com, including your name and address( not for publication ).


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here