Natural Cycles was acclaimed as a stress-free, hormone-free contraceptive. Then maidens began reporting unwanted pregnancies

Last summer I had an abortion. Statistically unremarkable, yes, but mine wasn’t because of a split condom or a missed pill. I was four months into a tense relationship with a much-hyped Swedish” digital contraceptive “, a smartphone app called Natural Cycles. I had spent my 20 s on the pill, but detested not knowing whether my emotional state was down to artificial hormones or not. My boyfriend and I had been together for eight months, and I was urgently striving something new, something that wouldn’t construct me feel so anxious.

That’s when the adverts started following me around on social media: glowing women reclining in Scandi bedrooms, all pale grey-haired expanses and dappled light-footed, brandishing basal thermometers and telling me how great it felt to” get to know yourself better “. Natural Cycles’ ads promised the” world’s first contraceptive app”, something” natural, hormone free& non-invasive “. I could start using it without a two-week wait for a doctor’s appointment and so, in a fug of hormones and annoyance, I bought a subscription. I was sold on shiny predicts, a elegant user interface and the fact that a former Cern physicist, Elina Berglund, was at the company’s helm. But four months in, it neglected. Berglund facilitated discover the Higgs boson; but it turns out her algorithm couldn’t map my menstrual cycle.

Femtech, or female health engineering, is going through a boom phase, with an estimated $ 1bn of investment invoked worldwide in the last three years. Apps such as Clue, Dot, Glow and Spot On are all popular date trackers, but Natural Cycles is the only one certified as contraception. In 2017, it was approved for use across the EU, getting the green light from the German inspection and certification organisation, Tuv Sud.

How does it cultivate? It comprises an app, an annual subscription of about PS60, and a thermometer accurate to two decimal point( free in the pole ). You input your temperature as soon as you wake up, and the app manufactures prognosis about your fertility each day: dark-green for” go have unprotected fornication”, red for” not unless you crave a child”( you can also use the app to project a pregnancy ). No hormones , no embed and, presumably , no stress. It has its own language: customers are known as ” Cyclers”, and useful information is available via a “Cyclerpedia”. It seems as easy as prescribing a takeaway or a taxi from your phone; of direction there’s an app for birthrate, too.

Natural Cycles has also recently registered more than 700,000 useds from more than 200 countries, 125,000 of them in the UK. But its certification as contraception is under review in Sweden, where the company and its married co-founders are based. In January, a major Swedish hospital reported that 37 of the 668 women who had sought an abortion there between September and December 2017 were applying Natural Cycles as their sole birth control, and the Medical Products Agency of Sweden began to investigate. Natural Cycles has responded that the number of pregnancies is proportional to the registered number of Swedish users and” in line with our apprehensions “; but as someone who didn’t report my own maternity last year, preventing it secret even from my parents, I wonder how many more “theres been”.

It wasn’t the stigma that stopped me quiet, or the sadness, though that trailed me all summer like the sinister theme of an ice-cream van. It wasn’t the fact that being 28, in a stable-seeming relationship and game for motherhood in a couple of years, I lacked an explanation other than perilous business and a relationship only shy of its first anniversary( those are excellent reasons ). No, my stillnes was because I felt colossally naive. I’d employed the app in accordance with procedures I do most of the technology in my life: not quite knowing how it toils, but taking for granted that it does. Speaking to others who bought the app as contraception( about 75% of Natural Cycles’ total user basi, are consistent with its CEO ), it seems that numerous feel the same.

I spoke to Amy, 29, who was fed up with hormones when she started employing the app as her sole birth control. 3 months later, she was pregnant, a” massive stun “. Though she admits she may have made a mistake, she can’t pinpoint the mistake.” You’re told all you need to know is yourself. I believes in it the same way I did the pill and visualized I did everything right .” Having already booked her uniting, she went ahead with the pregnancy, giving birth weeks before she went down the alley.” It’s supposed to draw you feel like you have more ensure, but in fact it did the opposite: when I fell pregnant it felt like a decision was taken out of our hands. It wasn’t how we’d have planned it, and I don’t recommend weds two weeks postpartum, but I’m lucky it was something we wanted in the long run .”

Marie, 30, first heard about the app when she saw an Instagram post about it( sought for Natural Cycles and you will find hundreds of posts by influencers telling you how it converted “peoples lives” ).” I didn’t spot the hashtag at the ending of the caption which said that it was a sponsored post ,” she says. She had been taking Yasmin, a usually prescribed contraceptive pill, for six years old when she made the switch, hoping that the app would be a reliable and easy alternative. A time into such relationships, and eight months into using Natural Cycles, Marie realised she was pregnant. She had an abortion that proved harrowing, contributing to the breakdown of the relationship and passing her into what she describes as” a quarry of despair “.

She didn’t want to tell anyone about it. She’d had an abortion once before, when a morning-after pill didn’t work, but this time she felt ashamed:” I felt like I’d acted alone in the decision to use the app and had been exceedingly relying. But I was also indignant that I’d been treated like a consumer , not a patient .”

Like Marie, I didn’t go to my GP before I switched to the app, probably because I subconsciously knew he’d advise against it. In numerous roads he knows me better than any algorithm can. He introduced me on the pill at 18 because I had an irregular hertz. I later learned I had polycystic ovary disorder, which I now know realizes me a appalling candidate for Natural Cycles, because my ovulation is unpredictable and erratic.

A year earlier, before I’d heard of the app, I had been to see a gynaecologist to discuss birth control, making I craved a non-hormonal coil fitted. It was the first time a medical professional has assisted in me to truly understand the scope of my options. She sucked me a specify of coordinates and schemed each alternative available( no app got a mention) to show me the benefits and drawbacks. Spotting v contractions, sadnes v maintenance, long- v short-term.

I’d speak frightful things about the hormonal vaginal resound- a widely shared article about a young, fit lady who died after a blood clot- but agreed, based on what she felt would suit me best, to try it. We laughed at how it’s impossible to research any birth control online without encountering repugnance narratives. I told myself I would rely health professionals and cease my Googling as it merely induced nervousnes; but after a few paranoid weeks wearing tighten socks to avoid blood clots, I was done.

None of the posts on my social-media feed suggested that being a ” Cycler ” “wouldve been” such a frustrating, often daunting commitment. One paid-for post I looked featured a still life of a puppy, a pair of on-trend headphones, a self-help book and a thermometer, with a 250 -word caption starting with” 5 things I required in the morning. Cuddles from Bee[ the dog ], tea, music, positive repeats and the first thing I do when I wake up- my Natural Cycles thermometer .” But I found that taking your temperature regularly is not so easy. The number of times I leapt out of bed bleary-eyed and needing to pee, then realised I hadn’t first taken my temperature, signified I started waking up in the middle of the night to pre-emptively urinate, panicked about missing my quantify space in the morning. On the pill, it didn’t matter if I’d only woken up, was lying down or standing up when I took it. With Natural Cycles, the slightest flow seemed to count. It was comedic until it became tragic; I got pregnant when the predictions of fertile and infertile converted back and forth in one day, turning from light-green to red, after I had unprotected sex.

I now know that the ideal Cycler is a narrow, preferably old-fashioned category of person. She’s in a stable tie-in with a stable lifestyle.( Shift-workers, world-travellers, the sickly, the emphasized, insomniacs and sluts be advised .) She’s about 29, and rarely ordeals deliriums or hangovers. She is savvy about birthrate and committed to the effort required to track hers. I could add that her phone is never lost or break-dance and she’s never late to work. She wakes up at the same time every day, with a charged phone and a thermometer within reach.

” From the data supplied by Natural Cycles, I expected that my body temperature would follow a clear pattern and that I would be able to pinpoint five days in every four-week cycle that I was fruitful ,” says Lucy, 32. She swopped from the pill after becoming concerned about an increased risk of breast cancer, after one of her friends was diagnosed.” I did feel like I was getting to understand my person better, but soon realised that I can’t pinpoint when I wake up each day. Some mornings I budge at 5am, roll over and try to sleep for another hour or two, sometimes I toss and turn from 2am to 6am and then fall asleep, and so on .” Her sees were erratic.” I couldn’t see a decoration and this undermined my confidence. After employing Natural Cycles for three full cycles, I observed I was still having eight to 10 red[ ie maybe fertile] epoches per repetition .” After four months, she decided it was no better than utilizing a calendar and went back on the pill.

No form of contraception is 100% effective; most are assessed according to two metrics: typical use and perfect use. “Typical” reflects a perimeter for human error; “perfect” is when it’s used absolutely correctly. With perfect implement, Natural Cycles tallies as 99% effective, with precisely 1 % of women becoming pregnant. With regular apply, according to clinical studies carried out by the company( self-selecting, rather than randomised restraint trials ), that plummets to 93%. This is often cited by the company as favourable compared with the pill( 91% effective with” regular implement “). But, unlike the pill, you’re not covered for every day of the month. You have to abstain or use other contraception on fruitful days. And in the first few months, as the app “gets to know you”, these are pretty near continuous.

When I talking about here Raoul Scherwitzl, the CEO and co-founder of Natural Cycles, he is charming and sincere and calls at precisely the appointed hour , not a few seconds early or late.” My wife and I represent a typical user-couple ,” he says.” Elina was on hormonal family planning for 10 years and we knew we wanted children, but in a couple of years. We both had PhDs in physics and were working at Cern, dealing with messy, fluctuating data, trying to look for the Higgs boson, which is basically looking for a signal amid racket. We started relating the same statistical methods to pinpoint my wife’s ovulation amid her differ temperatures. We read up on the literature and evolving an algorithm which our colleagues started employing, extremely. We were running it on the Cern servers and then employing Google spreadsheets. We encountered it as an unmet need. There was a lack of choice and we wanted to innovate in an important field .”

Natural Cycles founders Elina Berglund and Raoul Scherwitzl.

I tell Scherwitzl that, though the need is real, after purchasing the app, caveat after caveat exposed itself. I didn’t know it would take months to become reliable.” The algorithm is prudent by design ,” he illustrates.” It yields red daytimes unless it’s sure .” I tell him how I got pregnant, when the projections varied after I’d had sex. Scherwitzl empathises (” I am sorry to hear that “) but says that as well as “downsides”, there is” a huge upside with all the glad users” and that” the most important thing is to use protection on red eras: it relies on that “.

Has the company accommodated its communication strategy to reflect the experience of users who have become pregnant?” At the core, our messaging has always been floored on happenings but we do evolve what we say. We used to state the 93% flesh but without the right context, so there were certain expectations on the concoction .” The 93% chassis comes from existing useds responding to the company’s calls for players, research that has been criticised by a reproductive health expert as “inappropriate and misleading”, and more like ” marketing research” than a medical study. But Scherwitzl contends the data is robust, and preferable to a medicalised authority measure.” There are pros and cons to that type of study, and in our opinions this reflects all countries of the world better .”

What about the targeted advertising? Isn’t it strange to get social-media influencers( one foremost Swedish blogger is now an investor) to promote a medical concoction? He doesn’t think so.” Social media allows us to control the narrative because there’s lots of misinformation out there , not just with us but with every type of birth control. We are also welcome to target the right age group .”

The investigation by Sweden’s medical protector is now six months in, and has started its second phase, evaluating market substance, past clinical studies and fresh user data. Reports of unwanted pregnancies have not, however, had any negative effect on the business.

In a 2016 interview I bid I’d read, Scherwitzl’s wife and business partner Elina Berglund described her ideal customer as a woman who is planning to have children at some level, and who are willing to a shatter from hormonal contraception before trying. It’s not a good option for women who want to only avoided teenage pregnancies, she said. But somehow this meaning has got lost in Natural Cycles’ market; this is very much not what the word “contraception” are meant to me.

Indeed, on the section of the Natural Cycles website is targeted at medical professionals there is a” decision tree” for doctors considering prescribing the app as family planning. Is the patient over 18? Is she comply with her current birth control? If the answers to those questions are yes and no, then the third largest is: would she be “devastated” to get pregnant within the next year? If the answer is yes, the doctor is told not to prescribe the app. Perhaps those questions should be compulsory when you click through on a Natural Cycle link.

An portrait from the Natural Cycles Instagram note.

Instead, the app usurps the intimate expression of a trusted doctor, mixed with the kinds of gamified messaging you find on other apps. You might get an update saying,” Nice curves! You have a nice and smooth temperature veer with small day-to-day variances. Keep up the good work !” The company’s social media is peppered with hashtags such as # yourcyclematters and # wakeupmeasuregetup. The perkiness is grating- even the thermometer accepts the slogan “Good morning!”- and can be pressurising, very. One lady I was talking about who purchased Natural Cycles is attempting to schedule a pregnancy told the company she wanted to leave after six months, as the daily tracking was too traumatic. She emailed to ask for a breaking,” for emotional wellbeing “. A customer service manager responded to say she could cancel, and reactivate when she required, but that” I took a quick look at your data, and in terms of ovulation everything ogles good !”, including,” You do not need to worry about losing any data- we never delete anything !” Those utterance differentiates don’t making this reassurances any less creepy.

Perhaps this inaccurate gumption of intimacy is why it felt more like a betrayal to find myself pregnant than if the pill were at fault. After the abortion, the honeymoon reporting period my tie-in culminated abruptly. It felt like we’d begun our romantic race with a false-hearted start. I stopped using the thermometer and went back on the pill, but it took me a while longer to part routes with the app. I deleted it from my phone, merely to realise the direct debit was rolling and non-refundable. I has only just been been transported another PS60 bill, for a contraceptive app I no longer use, that got me pregnant. But it’s not just the money that bothers me – it’s the reminder that I applied so much faith in a engineering that in the end relied on something as inaccurate as my mas. What’s the hashtag for that?

* If you would like your comment to be considered for inclusion on Weekend magazine’s words page in etch, please email weekend @theguardian. com, including your name and address( not for publication ).


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here