Natural Cycles was hailed as a stress-free, hormone-free contraceptive. Then females began reporting unwanted pregnancies

Last summer I had an abortion. Statistically unremarkable, yes, but mine wasn’t because of a separate condom or a missed capsule. I was 4 months into a tense affair with a much-hyped Swedish” digital contraceptive “~ ATAGEND, a smartphone app called Natural Cycles. I had spent my 20 s on the pill, but hated not knowing whether my emotional state was down to artificial hormones or not. My boyfriend and I had been together for eight months, and I was urgently trying something better, something that wouldn’t induce me feel so anxious.

That’s when the adverts started following me around on social media: brightening women reclining in Scandi bedrooms, all pallid grey-headed membranes and dappled dawn, brandishing basal thermometers and telling me how great it believe it to” get to know yourself better “. Natural Cycles’ ads promised the” world’s first contraceptive app “, something” natural, hormone free& non-invasive “. I could start using it without a two-week “ve been waiting for” a doctor’s appointment and so, in a fug of hormones and resentment, I bought a subscription. I was sold on lustrous promises, a shiny user interface and the fact that a former Cern physicist, Elina Berglund, was at the company’s helm. But four months in, it failed. Berglund helped discover the Higgs boson; but it turns out her algorithm couldn’t delineate my menstrual cycle.

Femtech, or female health technology, is going through a thunder stage, with an estimated $ 1bn of such investments parent worldwide in the last three years. Apps such as Clue, Dot, Glow and Spot On are all popular date trackers, but Natural Cycles is the only one certified as contraception. In 2017, it was approved for use in the different regions of the EU, getting the green light from the German inspection and certification organisation, Tuv Sud.

How does it act? It comprises an app, an annual subscription of about PS60, and a thermometer accurate to two decimal point( free in the pole ). You input your temperature as soon as you wake up, and the app realise prophecies about your birthrate every day: park for” proceed have unprotected sex”, red for” not unless you want a babe”( you can also use the app to scheme teenage pregnancies ). No hormones , no implant and, presumably , no stress. It has its own language: customers are known as “Cyclers”, and useful information is available via a “Cyclerpedia”. It seems as easy as ordering a takeaway or a taxi from your telephone; of route there’s an app for birthrate, too.

Natural Cycles has now registered more than 700,000 consumers from more than 200 countries, 125,000 of them in the UK. But its certification as contraception is under review in Sweden, where the corporation and its married co-founders are based. In January, a major Swedish hospital reported that 37 of the 668 women who had sought an abortion there between September and December 2017 were applying Natural Cycles as their sole birth control, and the Medical Products Agency of Sweden began to investigate. Natural Cycles has responded that the number of maternities is proportional to the registered number of Swedish useds and” in line with our promises “; but as someone who didn’t report my own pregnancy last year, preventing it secret even from my mothers, I wonder how many more there have been.

It wasn’t the stigma that deterred me quiet, or the sadness, though that trailed me all summertime like the sinister tune of an ice-cream van. It wasn’t the fact that being 28, in a stable-seeming relationship and game for motherhood in a couple of years, I needed an explanation other than precarious investments and a relationship exactly shy of its first anniversary( those are excellent grounds ). No, my stillnes was because I felt colossally naive. I’d exploited the app in the way I do the majority of members of information and communication technologies in my life: not quite knowing how it cultivates, but taking for granted that it does. Speaking to others who bought the app as contraception( about 75% of Natural Cycles’ total user basi, according to its CEO ), it seems that many feel the same.

I spoke to Amy, 29, who was fed up with hormones when she started utilizing the app as her sole birth control. Three months later, she was pregnant, a” massive shock “. Though she declares she may have made a mistake, she can’t pinpoint the error.” You’re told all you need to know is yourself. I believed in it the same way I did the pill and ponder I did everything right .” Having already booked her marry, “shes gone” onward with the maternity, giving birth weeks before she went down the aisle.” It’s supposed to constitute you feel like you have more control, but in fact it did the opposite: when I descended pregnant it felt like policy decisions was taken out of our hands. It wasn’t how we’d have planned it, and I don’t recommend weddings 2 week postpartum, but I’m lucky it was something we wanted in the long run .”

Marie, 30, first been hearing the app when she saw an Instagram post about it( search for Natural Cycles and you will find hundreds of poles by influencers telling you how it changed their lives ).” I didn’t recognize the hashtag at the very end of the caption which said that it was a sponsored berth ,” she says. She had been taking Yasmin, a usually prescribed contraceptive pill, for six years old when she made the substitution, hoping that the app would be a reliable and easy alternative. A year into a relationship, and eight months into using Natural Cycles, Marie realised she was pregnant. She had an abortion that supported traumatic, make contributions to the breakdown of relations and producing her into what she describes as” a quarry of anguish “.

She didn’t want to tell anyone about it. She’d had an abortion once before, when a morning-after pill didn’t work, but this time she felt abashed:” I felt like I’d played alone in the decision to use the app and had been overly relying. But I was also angry that I’d been treated like individual consumers , not individual patients .”

Like Marie, I didn’t go to my GP before I switched to the app, probably because I subconsciously knew he’d advise against it. In many ways he knows me better than any algorithm can. He set me on the pill at 18 because I had an irregular hertz. I afterward learned I had polycystic ovary disorder, which I now know becomes me a horrible campaigner for Natural Cycles, because my ovulation is unpredictable and erratic.

A year earlier, before I’d heard of the app, I had been to see a gynaecologist to discuss birth control, making I craved a non-hormonal scroll fitted. It was the first time a medical professional had helped me to truly understand the fullest extent of my alternatives. She attracted me a situate of coordinates and plotted each alternative available( no app got a mention) to show me the benefits and flaws. Recognizing v convulsions, hollow v upkeep, long- v short-term.

I’d spoke grim acts about the hormonal vaginal resound- a widely shared article about a young, fit woman who died after a blood clot- but concurred, based on what she felt would suit me best, to try it. We giggled at how it’s impossible to experiment any birth control online without encountering fright stories. I told myself I would trust a professional and discontinue my Googling as it only induced feeling; but after a few obsessive weeks wearing squeeze socks to evade blood clots, I was done.

None of the posts on my social-media feed were of the view that being a “Cycler” “wouldve been” such a frustrating, often daunting commitment. One paid-for upright I assured boasted a still life of a puppy, a pair of on-trend headphones, a self-help work and a thermometer, with a 250 -word caption starting with” 5 circumstances I need in the morning. Snuggles from Bee[ the dog ], tea, music, positive quotes and the first thing I do when I wake up- my Natural Cycles thermometer .” But I found that taking your temperature regularly is not so easy. The number of days I leapt out of berth bleary-eyed and required to be pee-pee, then realised I hadn’t first taken my temperature, represent I started waking up in the middle of the night to pre-emptively urinate, panicked about missing my evaluating opening in the morning. On the pill, it didn’t matter if I’d just woken up, was lying down or standing up when I took it. With Natural Cycles, the slightest motion seemed to count. It was comedic until “its become” appalling; I got pregnant when the predictions of fruitful and infertile changed backward and forward in one day, turning from light-green to red, after I had unprotected sex.

I now know that the ideal Cycler is a narrow, rather old-fashioned category of being. She’s in a stable affair with a stable lifestyle.( Shift-workers, world-travellers, the sickly, the emphasized, insomniacs and sluts be advised .) She’s about 29, and rarely experiences excitements or hangovers. She is savvy about fertility and committed to the effort required to line hers. I could add that her phone is never lost or smash and she’s never sometime to employment. She wakes up at the same time every day, with a charged telephone and a thermometer within reach.

” From the information provided by Natural Cycles, I expected that my body temperature would follow a clear decoration and that I would be able to pinpoint five days in every four-week round that I was fruitful ,” says Lucy, 32. She swopped from the pill after becoming concerned about an increased risk of breast cancer, after one of her friends was diagnosed.” I did feel like I was getting to understand my form better, but soon realized that I can’t pinpoint when I wake up each day. Some mornings I incite at 5am, roll over and try to sleep for another hour or two, sometimes I toss and turn from 2am to 6am and then fall asleep, and so on .” Her construes were erratic.” I couldn’t see a pattern and this undermined my confidence. After employing Natural Cycles for three full rounds, I experienced I was still having eight to 10 blood-red[ ie maybe fertile] daytimes per cycle .” After four months, she decided it was no better than applying a docket and went back on the pill.

No form of contraception is 100% effective; most are assessed according to two metrics: usual its utilization and perfect help. “Typical” reflects a margin for human error; “perfect” is when it’s used absolutely correctly. With perfect employ, Natural Cycles tallies as 99% effective, with precisely 1 % of the status of women becoming pregnant. With regular expend, according to the report of clinical surveys carried out by the company( self-selecting, rather than randomised control experiments ), that plunges to 93%. This is often cited by the company as favourable compared with the pill( 91% effective with” regular call “). But, unlike the pill, you’re not covered for every day of the month. You have to abstain or use other contraception on fertile daytimes. And in the first few months, as the app “gets to know you”, these are pretty near continuous.

When I talk to Raoul Scherwitzl, the CEO and co-founder of Natural Cycles, he is charming and sincere and calls at precise the appointed hour , not a second early or late.” My wife and I represent a usual user-couple ,” he says.” Elina was on hormonal family planning for 10 years and we knew we wanted children, but in a couple of years. We both had PhDs in physics and were working at Cern, dealing with messy, fluctuating data, trying to look for the Higgs boson, which is basically looking for a signal amid interference. We started exercising the same statistical methods used pinpoint my wife’s ovulation amid her varied temperatures. We read up on the literature and developed an algorithm which our colleagues started expending, too. We were loping it on the Cern servers and then use Google spreadsheets. We looked it as an unmet need. There is the absence of pick and we wanted to innovate in an important province .”

Natural Cycles founders Elina Berglund and Raoul Scherwitzl.

I tell Scherwitzl that, though the involve is jolly, after purchasing the app, caveat after caveat discovered itself. I didn’t know it would take months to grown dependable.” The algorithm is cautious by design ,” he illustrates.” It dedicates crimson daylights unless it’s sure .” I tell him how I got pregnant, when the projections changed after I’d had sex. Scherwitzl empathises (” I am sorry to hear that “) but says that as well as “downsides”, there is currently” a huge upside with all the joyous useds” and that” the most important thing is to use safety on ruby-red dates: it relies on that “.

Has the company accommodated its communication strategy to reflect its own experience of users who have become pregnant?” At the core, our messaging “ve always been” floored on information but we do evolve what we say. We to benefit from state the 93% anatomy but without the right context, so there were certain expectations on the concoction .” The 93% illustration comes from subsisting useds responding to the company’s calls for players, research that has been criticised by a reproductive health expert as” inappropriate and misleading”, and more like “marketing research” than a medical study. But Scherwitzl contends the data is robust, and preferable to a medicalised self-control research.” There are pros and cons to that type of contemplate, and in our view this indicates the world better .”

What about the targeted ad? Isn’t it strange to get social-media influencers( one prominent Swedish blogger is now overseas investors) to promote a medical concoction? He doesn’t think so.” Social media allows us to control the narrative because there’s lots of misinformation out there , not just with us but with each type of family planning. We can also target the right age group .”

The investigation by Sweden’s medical watchdog is now six months in, and has started its second phase, refreshing market cloth, past clinical considers and fresh user data. Reports of unwanted pregnancies had not been able to, however, had any negative effects on the business.

In a 2016 interview I care I’d speak, Scherwitzl’s wife and business partner Elina Berglund described her model consumer as a woman who is planning to have children at some moment, and who are interested in a end from hormonal contraception before trying. It’s not a good option for women who want to exclusively avoid a pregnancy, she said. But somehow this message has got lost in Natural Cycles’ sell; this is very much not what the word “contraception” meant to be me.

Indeed, on the section of the Natural Cycles website aimed at medical professionals there is a” decision tree” for doctors considering prescribing the app as family planning. Is individual patients over 18? Is she satisfied with her current family planning? If the answers to those questions are yes and no, then the third largest is: would she be “devastated” to get pregnant within the next year? If the answer is yes, medical doctors is told not to prescribe the app. Perhaps those questions should be compulsory when you click through on a Natural Cycle link.

An persona from the Natural Cycles Instagram report.

Instead, the app assumes the intimate singer of a trusted physician, mixed with these kinds of gamified messaging you find on other apps. You might get an update saying,” Nice veers! You have a nice and smooth temperature arch with small day-to-day variants. Hinder up the good work !” The company’s social media is peppered with hashtags such as #yourcyclematters and #wakeupmeasuregetup. The perkiness is grating- even the thermometer tolerates the slogan” Good morning !”- and can be pressurising, too. One maiden I spoke to who bought Natural Cycles to try to design a pregnancy told the company she wanted to leave after six months, as the daily tracking was too traumatic. She emailed to ask for a infringe,” for psychological wellbeing “. A customer service manager responded to say she could cancel, and reactivate when she missed, but that” I took a quick look at your data, and in terms of ovulation everything ogles good !”, lending,” You do not need to worry about losing any data- we never delete anything !” Those utterance ratings don’t make such reassurances somewhat lower creepy.

Perhaps this inaccurate feel of friendship is for that reason that we felt more like a betrayal to discover myself pregnant than if the pill were at fault. After the abortion, the honeymoon period of my relation pointed hurriedly. It felt like we’d begun our nostalgic hasten with a untrue start. I stopped use the thermometer and went back on the pill, but it took me a little while longer to side modes with the app. I deleted it from my phone, exclusively to realise the direct debit was reeling and non-refundable. I has only been recently transported another PS60 bill, for a contraceptive app I no longer employ, that got me pregnant. But it’s not just the money that bothers me – it’s the reminder that I threw so much religion in a engineering that in the end relied on something as inaccurate as my mas. What’s the hashtag for that?

* If you would like your comment to be considered for inclusion on Weekend magazine’s characters page in periodical, please email weekend @theguardian. com, including your name and address( not for booklet ).


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here